Search found 47 matches
- Tue May 29, 2018 8:54 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: "Client has NOT closed socket first" in 2.3.0
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5660
Re: "Client has NOT closed socket first" in 2.3.0
Thank you! I will check this and report back.
- Tue May 29, 2018 12:53 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: "Client has NOT closed socket first" in 2.3.0
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5660
"Client has NOT closed socket first" in 2.3.0
Hallo, I am testing the current version 2.3.0 and in the server logs I get a lot: WARNING Client has NOT closed socket first. We are not using the web gui and I guess that you progammed the afrender to correctly close the socket. I have tried setting the option for SO_REUSEADDR to 1 according to htt...
- Tue May 16, 2017 10:36 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Question about server profiling
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17338
Re: Question about server profiling
Problem solved, I don't exactly know how. I just updated to HEAD and it went away.
- Thu Apr 06, 2017 1:30 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Parser Error not working as expected
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14601
Re: Parser Error not working as expected
Ok.
btw, how did you determine this is a good value for the stack?
btw, how did you determine this is a good value for the stack?
- Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:48 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Parser Error not working as expected
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14601
Re: Parser Error not working as expected
Could I update our production server to the current master to get the fix? Is the "pools" feature working/doing something? Any other major changes since 2.2.1, that I need to check?
- Fri Mar 31, 2017 11:58 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Question about server profiling
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17338
Re: Question about server profiling
I have visualized the profiling. proc times are getting higher the longer it runs.
and at some point the server just hangs. times are dropping to 6ms and no further connection possible. I have to restart it then.
and at some point the server just hangs. times are dropping to 6ms and no further connection possible. I have to restart it then.
- Thu Mar 30, 2017 3:05 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: json "save"
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3585
json "save"
via json I can save objects to the store: { "save": { "path" : "saved_object", "":"path will be related to CGRU_LOCATION and .json extension will be added", "object": { "prop_a":"value A", "prop_b":"value ...
- Tue Mar 28, 2017 5:29 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Question about server profiling
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17338
Re: Question about server profiling
I changed it and get about 10ms for proc now (which was constantly 0 before). I also noticed that there were 2 other afserver instances running (for whatever reason) maybe they are making the high times....
- Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:52 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Question about server profiling
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17338
Re: Question about server profiling
Could it be there is a bug in the profiler? From the code profiler.cpp Line 108: double prep = 0.0; double proc = 0.0; double post = 0.0; for( int i = 0; i < ms_profiles.size(); i++) { prep += toFloat( ms_profiles[i]->m_tstart ) - toFloat( ms_profiles[i]->m_tinit ); proc += toFloat( ms_profiles[i]->...
- Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:24 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Question about server profiling
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17338
Re: Question about server profiling
load average is 0.56, the host (8 core 16Gb) is pretty bored. There are 600 jobs in the queue, 17 rendering, 20 ready.